Showing posts with label unwanted advice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unwanted advice. Show all posts

Friday, February 18, 2011

The Art of Breaking Bad News - Part Three

So I've talked about when not to break bad news, I've talked about when to break bad news.  Now, lets consider whether or not to break it at all.

Do:
If it's yours to tell.
If it's true.
If the knowing will be valuable to the person to whom you are breaking said news.
If it involves people about whom the or she cares.


Don't:
If it isn't yours to tell. If you're telling best friend B that best friend A's husband was seen stepping out with friend D by friend E, it isn't yours to tell, it's called gossip and will earn you an F in trustworthiness
If you're not sure it's accurate.  75% isn't good enough.
If knowing can not possibly be of value to the person to whom you are breaking said news. If it's unrelated bad news, or bad news for bad news' sake, why would you burden him or her with it?
If you have promised someone else not to share it because, as above, it isn't yours to tell.

Thursday, February 17, 2011

The Art of Breaking Bad News- Part Two

When to break bad news: when time is not an issue. As I said last time I pontificated on how to break bad news, this is advice for when there is nothing to be done, nothing to be lost in the waiting an hour, a day.

Wait until the person you have to tell the bad news to has a moment.

1. Do not interrupt their doing something that needs doing and will complicate their day/week/month if it isn't done correctly.

2.  DO:  If the bad news is expected, perhaps they will ask.  For instance, if you are coming from the hospital where great-grandma has been barely hanging on to life, you're likely to get the question earlier than later, and the asker won't ask until they are ready to deal with the information

3. DO: Ask for a moment to talk about something serious.  Something as simple as "would you like me to make you some tea, I have something I need to tell you."  This helps them mentally prepare for bad news, and if it's a horrid time for them to get any more bad news, they have the opportunity to say "hey, can it wait?"

4. DO NOT: Though it may be tempting, do not interrupt a relaxed and much anticipated moment, such as a pleasant dinner after a really hard day or that television series' season premier for which they've waited 8 months and specifically structured their schedule to carve out the time for.  No, this is not a TiVo moment.  When there is nothing to be done, at all, except cope with the news, then the recipient of the news has the right to enjoy the things to which they've been looking forward.

5. DO: Convey the news when you're alone with the person or persons to whom you must tell the bad news.  No sense sharing their bad news with unconcerned parties in front of whom they will not feel comfortable responding authentically, but rather feel the need to mask their emotions.

Examples of good opportunities for breaking bad news:
Over coffee
Over ice cream
On a walk
In the car when tensions aren't too high
In a place the recipient of the news feels comfortable - kitchens are great for this, and meal preparation gives the recipient something else to focus on in the name of moving forward, just be sure to be ready to order take-out if it goes poorly
When an associated topic comes up in conversation.


Monday, January 31, 2011

5 Reasons to Say "I Don't"

Sometimes the universe aligns and you live happily ever after.
Sometimes you just thought it did and as the date approaches, you know that it's going to be an unmitigated disaster.
Sometimes you're not sure which it is, so here is my handy dandy guide to when you need to say "No."

1. You're related. I don't mean third cousin related, I mean "hey, isn't it weird that we're both test tube babies, with the same weird genetic condition, and look like we could pass for siblings?" So if you two met at the family reunion, it's okay to call it off.

2. You're in love with someone else, or your partner is.  Seriously, hung up on someone else is not the way to start a relationship, especially since it means you'll be more likely to jump ship anyhow.  Love- Don't feel it? Don't do it.

3. You're only doing it because you think you're supposed to.  Seriously, if you don't want to go through with a wedding, you probably don't want to go through with the marriage.  Just because everyone else is saying "It's high time," doesn't mean that it's the right thing to do.

4. You've been lying the whole time. About your age, your religion, your criminal history, your home planet, your gender, your species, your health history, the fact that you like skim milk.  Whatever it is, if you've got a deep dark secret you can't share with this person, then you can't share a life with them, and it certainly is better to call a halt to it before you say "I do."

5. Your partner is abusive.  Mentally, physically, emotionally, sexually.  It's always okay to get out of an abusive relationship, but it's not okay to slog along and put up with it just to be married. No, your partner will not change after the wedding.  Your eye shouldn't be the something (black and ) blue at your wedding, nor should your self-image.

There ya go, in no particular order, 5 reasons to not get married. 

Now, the rest of you? Happy wedding bells. 

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Worthless.

This morning, over on Single Dad Laughing, I read a thought provoking piece on the types of negative and demeaning comments women make about themselves, and how Dan, the Single Dad himself, thinks that the problem basically boils down to men behaving like Neanderthals and oogling airbrushed magazine covers, and prairie-dogging when a young busty hottie with "perfect legs" walks by.
I applauded taking some of the blame, but mostly, I cringed.

Why, oh why, does it have to be about the men in our lives?  At some point, YES, if men stopped behaving like hormonal teenagers whenever they saw something idealized, maybe that would change how many women hurt to see that some idealized version of the female body seems to turn her partner or desired partner's head more than she does.  Yes, that can hurt. Yes, men should be more aware of it, but it's NOT ABOUT THE MEN.

Yes, I yelled that.

This is about women. When women say hurtful things about themselves, it isn't because a man put that notion into our head. There are a lot of reasons.

We live in a society that tells us we have to be perfect to be valued, but we are contributing members of that society. Why are there airbrushed scantily clad women on magazine covers? Because they sell. And not just to men. To women.  We have agreed that these skinny ready-to-roll icons are what we should be, full well knowing that for many women, it's unattainable.

Quick question- who is the most beautiful woman on the planet?  Did a bunch of famous faces flash through your head? Did you sort them by "her lips are too big," "she's too bony," "she could stand to lose a few pounds," or "maybe if she were a readhead."  Now, who is the sexiest man on the planet?  Again, finding little bitty things you would change about everyone you consider?

Now, of all the women you've known, who was the most beautiful? The sexiest? Of all the men?

Serioiusly, think about it.

I am going to wager that a lot of the people we really find amazingly sexy, desirable, or worthy of emulation don't really fit into the mold of idealized perfection.  I certainly know that one of the most beautiful women I can think of weighs nearly 300 lbs and wouldn't make it on the cover of Cosmo, but I don't think anyone who knows her would argue that she isn't beautiful. Because when we look at people in our lives, when we talk to them, do we really continue to view them based on their thighs and cheekbones?  No, we don't. We notice the light in their eyes, the way they smile, we view them as them.

So why on earth do we continue to heap upon ourselves this load of bull that we have to compare ourselves to idealized standards?  It's not because something turns a man on.

I have an unpopular hypothesis. I think we continue to devalue ourselves because we want to.  We're afraid that if we admit "Hey, I'm spectacular. I'm beautiful, I'm smart, I'm funny, and I'm just right the way I am," then we don't have any more excuses.  So we CHOOSE to see the worst in ourselves and raise the bar of what we should be higher and higher and make it more and more unattainable so we can always say "spectacular is too hard to achieve, so I'm not going to try."

It's not just about how we look. It's whether or not we try new things, whether or not we try to get that new job, why we don't put ourselves out there.  It's safer, and easier to say "I can't, I'm not good enough, I'm not going to try."

No man does that to us.  We do it to ourselves.  They do it to themselves.

So guys, yes, stop being jerks. It feeds into the complexes of those of us who are more comfortable being afraid of believing in ourselves.  But moreover, EVERYONE- take a look in the mirror. Find something you like.  Chances are, someone else likes it too.  Now think about something you're good at.  See, there? Look at you being all good at something.  You're awesome.  Now make a point of finding the awesome in others and making sure they know you know it.

NOTE- This isn't nearly as eloquent as what I want to write, but at the moment I feel like timely is more important than eloquence.

Sunday, October 17, 2010

On Subsequent Showers

When you see a newborn baby, can you tell, by looking just at the baby, what that baby's birth order was?  No, you really can't.
Not even at 3 months

When I was pregnant with my second child, and excited about my upcoming shower, a usually very nice woman looked at me, aghast, and said "you don't get to have a shower for your second baby.  That's just wrong.  Showers are for first babies."  She proceeded to go on about how second showers are greedy and in poor taste.

If felt like getting slapped, and I have to say, took a lot of enjoyment out of my baby shower, the following weekend.  It upset me so much that I still feel punched in the gut about it and my baby is nearly a year and a half old.  Of course, when I said "my daughter is 10 years old, we have no baby stuff, and I never had a shower when I was pregnant for her, so what, then I just don't get one ever?" she backpedaled, a little.  She did add "well, if you didn't invite anyone who may have sent a gift for her, I guess it's alright."

No. It's not alright.  It's good, and wonderful, and exciting.

Showers are celebrations of the coming life and ways for communities of friends and family to come together to meet the needs of the soon-to-be-born baby and lift the spirits of the tired mother, presumably in her third trimester, or as more and more often done, the exhausted new mother.

Even women whose children are born less than 2 years apart are likely to have given away much of their newborn gear to a friend or relative, if one is inclined to use sposies, they're always in need, as are things like wipes and other non-renewable things.

In about two hours, I'm heading to a baby shower, for a second baby, of a dear friend of mine.  This baby will be some 5 years younger than her brother. I know for a fact that this mother has given away most of her baby gear since the birth of her son, as we rocked her co-sleeper and Boppy, are still rocking her high-chair, and lots and lots of other baby paraphernalia, and we weren't the first fortunate recipients of her son's hand-me-downs.  Yet, when I tweeted that my friend was having a shower the other day, some people started in with the "subsequent showers are greedy" script.

No. They are not greedy.

In this case, the mom didn't run out and register for all the things she wants, and the friend hosting sent out a low key invitation asking for loved but lovable hand-me-downs.  Me? I made a quilt similar to the one I made for her big brother five years ago. I might also be bringing some prefolds, because lets face it, every house needs them, even when you're planning on going sposie.  My mom plans to bring some zinc oxide butt cream and some icky nasty sposies, just like she would for a first baby's shower. Why?  Because the people who say that gifting a subsequent child and preparing for their birth is selfish have missed the point.  It's not about how many times you give to a specific family, whether the second or the fifth child. It's about being there for the mom, supporting and welcoming the kidlets to come.

There is no law saying that because you went in to buy the $300 stroller and carseat combo last time that you have to spend as much for a second child, maybe $15 on a sweater and hat or $5 on a new pack of bibs, a sweet lovey/skullie or maybe even a little baby sized sock monkey. I prefer handmade myself, but this isn't about me.  It's about welcoming and preparing for a new baby.  You can even bring something small for the older sibling. It's all good.  Show up, spread the love. That's the point.

So before you get all irritable the next time you hear someone is having a second, or a third, or a fourth baby shower, remember, there are always things, even small inexpensive things, like infant nail clippers which retail for $1.50, which will make the family more ready for the baby, and give everyone a great opportunity to get together and send a strong message of support to the mother.

Hate the "stuff" part of showers but want to support a mom who really does have everything?  Why not give her a Blessing Way instead of a shower?  None of the naysayers can effectively argue that heaping blessings on a mama is selfish and inappropriate.

Thursday, July 01, 2010

Sitting in Judgement.

I don't agree with the choices all of my friends make.
I don't agree with all of the choices my family members make.
My friends and family don't agree with all the choices I make.

I do, however, respect that we all make the best choices we can for our families with the information, limitations, and past experiences we have.

Sometimes the choices are trivial things.  Like choosing whether to put shoes on your crawler or not.  Sometimes they're silly, like whether it's okay to dress your children one way or another. Perhaps I like a mohawk on a baby, perhaps, that offends you.  Perhaps you like pink on girls, perhaps I like it on boys.  My sister-in-law disapproves of baby leggings.

Sometimes the choices are less trivial. Where your children sleep. What kind of diapers they wear, whether or not your ten year old can have a cell phone.  Sometimes they're where your child is allowed to play and with how much supervision.  Maybe I helicopter and you free range.  Perhaps we both doubt the longterm safety of each option.

Perhaps we disagree on bigger issues.  Sometimes the choices are between things like breastfeeding or formula feeding. Whether or not to circumcise.  The sorts of things we might feel deeply and passionately about.  Spanking or redirecting.

It's okay for us to debate these things.  Having thoughtful discourse about our differences is something we should welcome.  We should embrace the chance to better explain why we feel the way we do, and still feel comfortable agreeing or disagreeing with our friends.

We don't have to agree on everything to be friends or to be friendly.

Sometimes we disagree on issues so big we don't like to talk about them.  Issues like termination.  I might feel one way, you might feel another.  I like to think that we all agree that every termination is a tragedy, but maybe we don't.

Again, I hope that we are all capable of having our opinions, having our reasons, voicing them and discussing them rationally without damaging our friendships. However, no matter what our opinions are, there is no excuse, in any disagreement, particularly in the most extreme of choices, to shame a woman for making a choice with which you disagree.

Using the tragedies of others to highlight your own politics or religion, at their expense, is not being a friend, even if you dress it up like "compassionate advice."   We can support each other, even if we don't agree, because we are friends, because we are women, because we are human.

Before you find yourself sitting in judgement from the comfort of your desk chair over the choices with which you disagree, take a moment to remember that we should all treat each other with compassion.  I'm not perfect, you're not perfect, and maybe if we all are a little kinder to one another we can keep being friends, even when we disagree.

Saturday, June 20, 2009

Co-Sleeping in the Pool

One of my favorite things in the whole wide world is water.
I love to drink it, soak in it, feel it running down my skin, watch the sunlight ripple off of it, smell it in the air.
I love water.
I love lakes, rivers, oceans, bathtubs, pools, creeks, streams, brooks, and fish bowls. Love it.
So today, when Snapdragon was in a happily dozing mood, I left him in the nearly capable hands of Spouse and snuck off for an hour to go swim at the gym in the delightfully regulated warm water pool. Now, the warm water pool attracts a lot of people, but mostly people looking for some pain relief but still wanting to be mobile. Its what got me hooked on the pool. When I arrived, I was the only person there, and that was perfect. I had the whole pool to myself, to float, swim, work on my aqua-pilates and ai chi all I wanted without having to talk to anybody. Little did I know that the talking to others would prove so interesting.
Shortly after getting into the pool and beginning to take advantage of the wet solitude, another woman came into the pool and she began doing her stretches near me.
I am not socially adept, so I make myself greet the non-creepy people if they come withing a certain distance of myself.
Very shortly after greeting the woman and exchanging pleasantries, Snapdragon came up conversationally in the way that children do, and she inquired about him and shared that her daughter had a 2 month old baby, and this led the conversation to becoming ever increasingly personal. We talked about how her daughter was breastfeeding and how she worried that her daughter's maternity leave was insufficient because of how tightly the two were bonded to one another, and then I did something that I hadn't realized was all that controversial.
I made a comment about co-sleeping.
Her body language changed entirely and she began asking questions. The types of questions you'd expect to be asked if you were being investigated for neglect. Questions like do you have a co-sleeper or does the baby just sleep in the bed with you. Then it comes out that she chairs the committee that investigates all the infant and child deaths in the state.
Interesting.
But she continues to tell me that co-sleeping accidents account for what she implied was a majority of infant mortalities, and I blinked, because I am quite sure that it isn't the majority culprit, elsewise there would most certainly be a stronger anti-co-sleeping campaign than there already is. It wouldn't just be "back to bed, tummy to play," but "back to YOUR OWN bed, tummy to play." Surprisingly, it isn't.
So I ask, "Do you find, statistically, that most of the co-sleeping related mortalities also involve the use of alcohol, sedatives, or other drugs?"
"Yes," she says, "it's the first question we ask when investigating."
Hmmm.
Interestingly, by the time we'd finished our conversation, I felt even better about my choice to co-sleep, but I also could honestly say, no, my husband doesn't sleep in the bed because he sleeps too soundly and neither of us are comfortable with him sleeping in the same bed as Snapdragon, and yes, we do have a rigid sided co-sleeper in the bed. Snapdragon doesn't always use it, but we do use it frequently. No, I don't take any drugs, use alcohol, smoke, or otherwise utilize mind and wakefulness impairing substances, and because I'm a light sleeper and breastfeeding, I am more keenly aware of his movements. Oddly, she seemed supportive by the end of the conversation. Aparently her daughter is a co-sleeper too.
So why, oh why, can someone please tell me why is it that someone who isn't actually against co-sleeping would react with something tantamount to horror and professional clinical question badgering when confronted with the idea of co-sleeping?
Seriously. Why? I don't get it. I don't understand why something that people have done since the dawn of time would get this kind of reaction, when even according to her the problem isn't the location of the sleeping but the extraneous irresponsible circumstances?
We need to take a moment to step back and reevaluate our knee-jerk reactions, because with her credentials, if i'd not pressed the issue of discussing causes as opposed to circumstances, I might be tonight worried sick over how I was going to alter our sleeping schedule and arrangements to better fit the standard detached and aloof parenting model of dropping the kid in his wooden cage in another room and letting him cry himself unconscious, all because it had been implied that co-sleeping might be dangerous.

On the other hand, I did learn some valuable tips on co-sleeping that I hadn't considered before. This one sticks out in my mind most keenly though. If your bed is not on the floor, you need to not have a garbage can next to the bed, particularily not one lined with a plastic bag, because aparently some squirmy children will find their way off the bed if napping with an overtired parent (who shouldn't be co-sleeping anyway if a child can wiggle off the bed without waking you) but then into the bag lined can, and the story can end most sadly. I hadn't thought of that possibility. I did have a garbage can next to my bed. I no longer do.

I admit my cosleeping patterns aren't perfect. I'd be happier if the mattress was on the floor, and I'm still using a woven blanket. Some habits are harder to break than others. But we're working on it, and so far, it's working really well for us, but it begs the question, are you co-sleeping, and how do people react when you talk about it?